Search for: "Matter of Will of Smith" Results 2961 - 2980 of 9,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2013, 2:41 am
Patent attorney Gregory Scott Smith (Smith Risley Tempel Santos, USA) had several pieces of advice about the US. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 9:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A trademark matter came up in John Blackstone's piece on the band Chicago, once Chicago Transit Authority. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 8:59 am by Mark Tushnet
(The constitutional part of that involves "hybrid" claims under Smith; the statutory part involves RFRA-type statutes that do more than re-state pre-Smith law.) [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 7:12 am by Dan Bressler
“‘We couldn’t arm our partners to the nuances of these client differences,” said Steve Smith, the firm’s director of matter management services, describing a problem of ‘excessive diligence. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Importantly, Supreme Court credited the father's testimony that, were he to become the primary custodial parent, he would allow the mother free and frequent access to the child and, finding no basis in the record to disagree, the court declines to disturb the court's determination in that regard as in Matter of Smith v Smith. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:45 pm
Sackett and Havens, 15 N.Y. 365; Matter of Ballard, 194 App.Div. 106, 185 N.Y.S. 718; Matter of Smith's Estate, 150 Misc. 367, 269 N.Y.S. 270, 110 A.L.R. 1317), and she was not required to serve and file a notice of election therefor under section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 7:30 pm
Sackett and Havens, 15 N.Y. 365; Matter of Ballard, 194 App.Div. 106, 185 N.Y.S. 718; Matter of Smith's Estate, 150 Misc. 367, 269 N.Y.S. 270, 110 A.L.R. 1317), and she was not required to serve and file a notice of election therefor under section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
The Declaration of Donald Smith, M.D. provides substantial expert evidence that Dr. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:58 am
  The judge went on to explain that [a]s an initial matter, Wolff's argument that the government's acceptance of the devices constitutes a Fourth Amendment seizure of any kind—let alone an unlawful one—is ill taken. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:24 am by SHG
Shocking in its simplicity, Justice Bradley goes right to the heart of the matter. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 1:00 pm by Adam Faderewski
He believes safeguards should be in place before matters go to trial. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 1:00 pm by Adam Faderewski
He believes safeguards should be in place before matters go to trial. [read post]