Search for: "Court Employees of Public Defender's Office" Results 281 - 300 of 5,952
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The evolution of New York’s whistle blower laws protecting public officers and employees Castro v City of New York, 2016 NY Slip Op 05615, Appellate Division, First DepartmentIn his notice of claim dated November 17, 2012, Robert J. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 9:58 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Not long after, the defendant’s corporate office decided to eliminate 22 positions across 8 holding companies. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:35 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
That said, allowing such unfettered, anonymous carping by employees in a criminal justice setting can become corrosive and harmful. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
A district court case from Connecticut shows how public employees can maintain First Amendment retaliation claims against municipalities despite Garcetti v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 8:22 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
We thus hold that, by alleging the transmission of defamatory messages about project 44 to directors and an officer of project44, the complaint adequately alleges publication. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 7:50 pm by Allan Blutstein
Cal.) -- dismissing complaint because plaintiff improperly named an employee of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys as the defendant instead of the agency; stating in dicta that agency appeared to have conducted adequate search for records, which was sole issue in dispute.Summaries of all opinions issued since April 2015 available here. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 11:23 am by Stephen M. Fuerch
In one recent case that the Second District Court of Appeal decided in favor of the employee, the employee faced an extra leap: overcoming his employer’s anti-SLAPP defense. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 11:23 am by Stephen M. Fuerch
In one recent case that the Second District Court of Appeal decided in favor of the employee, the employee faced an extra leap: overcoming his employer’s anti-SLAPP defense. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:53 pm
The same system, in parallel, applies to employees of the federal public defenders offices in the 9th Circuit. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding no occasion to address the “quite different question” of whether a public employee speaks as a citizen when he testifies in the course of his ordinary job responsibilities, the court pointed out that for some public employees – such as police officers, crime scene technicians, and laboratory analysts, “testifying is a routine and critical part of their employment duties. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York were unsealed today in federal court in Brooklyn charging 44 defendants with various crimes related to efforts by the national police of the People's Republic of China (PRC)—the Ministry of Public Security (MPS)—to harass Chinese nationals residing in the New York metropolitan area and elsewhere in the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 7:22 am by Dan Bressler
” “Court records indicate that the situation grew out of a 2017 case in which a district court judge ruled the City Council had illegally removed the mayor, Diane Broderson, from office, and Mandsager filed a defamation lawsuit against Broderson and the city. [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:50 pm by John C. Manoog III
Although the defendant did not own the street on which the plaintiff fell, there was deposition testimony that the patch of ice that caused the fall may have resulted from the use of a hose by the defendant’s employees. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 1:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
’” The strongest evidence of the individual defendant’s involvement was that he reviewed a draft of the website copy before publication and didn’t object. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:40 am
Some courts have recognized some exception for this under the rubric of “wrongful termination in violation of public policy,” for instance if an employee is fired for refusing to do something illegal. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:40 am by SHG
But the kicker is this: In conjunction with [Glazer’s] Office, within 60 days the City’s Corporation Counsel will identify a new training program for all employees of The Bronx Defenders to ensure that its attorneys are zealously representing the interests of their clients and observing their responsibilities as officers of the court. [read post]