Search for: "David L. Evans"
Results 281 - 300
of 334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
There was a time in the not too distant past when the authorization of same-sex marriage was squarely a blue-state phenomenon. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:27 am
Evans, was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:33 am
We have excellent historical research in Scotland in the substantial work of John Cairns, David Sellar, and many other colleagues who have their research networks (Scottish Legal History Group for example), which focus largely though not wholly on legal education in Renaissance - Enlightenment Scotland. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:17 pm
I have seen the look of disdain on people’s faces when one mentions on meeting new people the ‘L’ for ‘Law’ word. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Evans, in which the Court had invalidated an anti-gay referendum in Colorado because it was motivated purely by animus—and thus did not even pass the Court’s lowest level of judicial scrutiny. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
The Sydney Morning Herald had a piece “David Leyonhjelm faced having property seized to enforce defamation payment, court told”. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
MBA/EA, Int’l/Expat Tax. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Aaron Caplan, and I filed a brief—with the invaluable help of pro bono local counsel Karin L. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:19 pm
Evan Fox-Decent, McGill University, Canadá81. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Cardozo School of Law--A Last Walk with Bob on a Hot July Day in New Haven: Why Did He Then as Always Want to Talk About The Brothers Karamazov, with an Imaginary Application to the Chauvin Trial of 2021 Steven L. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:38 am
He admitted his adultery and resigned from his race for Louisiana Governor. (2007)[240] Randall L. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Evans (1993), the Court had held that even under the lowest level of scrutiny, a law motivated by animus against a disfavored group could not survive. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
McCalmont, Janna L. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
David's also been kind enough to send a picture. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
David's also been kind enough to send a picture. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
In granting a Rule 702 motion to exclude the expert witnesses who relied upon a DPA, the trial judge rejected the probativeness of DPAs, based upon the FDA’s rejection of such analyses for anything other than signal detection.[3] In the Accutane litigation, statistician David Madigan attempted to support his fatally weak causation opinion with a DPA for Crohn’s disease and Accutane adverse event reports. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:40 am
As David Evans and Richard Schmalensee have pointed out, however, that result is far from inevitable. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
(quoting Cont'l Cas. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Concord, MA; Dipak Patel, President) Barry L Gordon Sales Inc. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
A panel of thirteen judges on the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit just issued an opinion in Zarda v. [read post]
