Search for: "Does 1-11, inclusive" Results 281 - 300 of 1,597
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
The inclusion of paragraph 4 in part 1 to the schedule to the 2000 Regulations, whatever its purpose, does not, in my view, carry for paragraph 4 persons the implication of entitlement to a right to reside. 33. [read post]
25 May 2014, 2:10 am by Brad Hokanson
  The bankruptcy court issued a discharge order on May 11, 2012 and the IRS appealed. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
Does the suggested new Comment benefit by the inclusion of the modifier ‘obvious’ before “relevant facts”? [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 8:39 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, despite the heavy interest in pirated copies, the game does appear to be selling quite well on legitimate channels, with over 1 million players enjoying it on Steam. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:49 am by leXpeak - Author
The Employer argued that the regulation section pertaining to job orders does not contain the same content requirements as those for advertisements. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:49 am by Unknown
The Employer argued that the regulation section pertaining to job orders does not contain the same content requirements as those for advertisements. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 2:27 pm by Ken
No replies yet — but I’ll let you know. 1. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 7:15 am by Unknown
The So-Close Case Study," International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24 Dec. 2022 [open access]"NGO-academia research co-production in humanitarian settings: opportunities and challenges," Disasters, vol. 47, no. 2 (April 2023) [open access]"Participatory approaches and methods in gender equality and gender-based violence research with refugees and internally displaced populations: a scoping review," Conflict and Health, 17:58 (Dec. 2023) [open access]"Standard… [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:28 am by Jessica Kroeze
Independent claim 1 of the main request found allowable by the opposition division reads as follows:"1. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
The statutory inclusion of occupational disease claims was a slow process driven by employer profits. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The quoted statement concerning “an uneven or unbalanced layering” (see D5, page 15, lines 8 to 11) does not support the suggestion that the invention could involve the deposition of an amorphous diamond coating on one side of the substrate only. [read post]
13 May 2008, 10:26 am
The State argues that the trial court erred when it found that Indiana Code section 35-42-4-11, as applied to Pollard, violated Article 1, Section 24 of the Indiana Constitution. [read post]