Search for: "Doles v. Doles"
Results 281 - 300
of 698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In the 1992 case of New York v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:04 am
See Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 9:19 pm
In Kokesh v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:10 am
In in South [Dakota] v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:34 pm
Dole. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
In putting the contingency claims forward, the government rests on the Supreme Court’s 1998 case Texas v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 5:00 am
In Glassell Producing Company v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 5:00 am
In Glassell Producing Company v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
A reasonable accommodation is defined as an action that permits an employee with a disability to perform the duties of his or her job position in a reasonable manner.*** ECSO Policy # 03-01-07, Light Duty Assignments The Doles decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2014/2014_07788.htmThe County of Erie decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2014/2014_07829.htm [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 7:59 am
The "intellectual property" issue:UVA argued that the definition of "proprietary" appliedin Green v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:00 am
Dole 710 F. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Dole (1987) NFIB v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:38 pm
., v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:11 pm
By way of background, Stanford v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 2:09 pm
The Supreme Court is asked to consider whether an individual can unilaterally override the effect of the Bayh-Dole Act. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 6:48 pm
The new policy reflects expansion of benefits for veterans included in the Health Improvement Act (The Cleland-Dole Act), signed into law by President Biden in 2022. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 1:55 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York in United States, et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
The Appellate Division, Second Department, in its March 6, 2019 decision in Schatz v. [read post]
