Search for: "Dollar v. U. S"
Results 281 - 300
of 616
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
In Davies v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
In StorageCraft Technology v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
You went to American U in the early Sixties, a turbulent time when organized left-wing student activism was just getting started and students and faculty alike were outraged over the discovery of a secret U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 7:55 am
Apple v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Entre avril 1997 et juin 2003, il a ainsi obtenu 38 millions de dollars en faveur de ces derniers et il a perçu en retour 6,7 millions de dollars en commissions secrètes, principalement sous forme de paiements à son entreprise. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 11:11 am
Supreme Court threw out the Sixth Circuit’s ruling and ordered the Sixth Circuit to reconsider its ruling in the FTS case and, in doing so, consider the standards announced in the high court’s 2016 ruling in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 11:11 am
Supreme Court threw out the Sixth Circuit’s ruling and ordered the Sixth Circuit to reconsider its ruling in the FTS case and, in doing so, consider the standards announced in the high court’s 2016 ruling in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 9:29 am
It accounts for five trillion dollars in annual commercial activity involving a third of maritime traffic worldwide. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
Hoffman v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 7:32 pm
Crespo, Yanelys, Uber V. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:28 pm
Relevant to this case, enhancement to a class C felony is available if `[t]he value of the property or services appropriated is five hundred dollars or more but less than twenty-five thousand dollars. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 4:45 am
Harvard U., 3:15-CV-30023-MGM, 2016 WL 3561622, at *15 (D. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
Further down the page, I’ll address the HR implications of yesterday’s remarkable decision in Nevada v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 2:14 pm
That means the lower court’s ruling in Stahl v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 2:14 pm
That means the lower court’s ruling in Stahl v. [read post]
