Search for: "In Re Baxter" Results 281 - 300 of 467
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm by Bexis
We have to admit that we’re scratching out heads about a recent decision out of Alabama that – contrary to everything else we’ve seen – concluded that the manufacturer of a branded drug could be liable in a case where it never sold the generic product that was all the plaintiff every took and thereby (allegedly) suffered injury.It’s not like this issue hasn’t been litigated before in Alabama.The first Alabama case we know of to consider the issue was… [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 7:45 pm by Curt Cutting
  (We're just speculating here; we have no first-hand information about the reason for the motion). [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The Friedrich court was referring to In Re Bates, High Court of Justice, Family Division, Royal Courts of London, No. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
It talks about legal standards, and its logic is interesting (note: if you're bright, you'll be able to tell what parts of the opinion could just as easily gone the other way if the Court had so chosen). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Baxter Travenol Labs., 952 F.2d 388, 392 (Fed. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
Some of our critics have interpreted our remarks as an attempt to re-litigate that infamous McDonald's case. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:07 am
  The latter being Justices Chin, Baxter and Corrigan.The majority opinion is authored by Justice Moreno. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
And if you’re homeless, you’ll want to target Gerald L. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:02 am by SOIssues
They’re watched, they’re labeled, they’re put on the website. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:18 am by David Lat
(Read Brian Baxter’s detailed report over at Am Law Daily.)More recent partner defections have also involved Howrey higher-ups. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
  Nor do Justices Werdegar and Moreno, who dissent.But Justice Baxter makes a nonfrivolous argument to the contrary, and persuades the remainder of the California Supreme Court.It's a tough call. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:51 am by Stefanie Levine
In re Baxter Travenol Labs., 952 F.2d 388, 392, 21 USPQ2d 1281, 1285 (Fed. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:51 am by Stefanie Levine
In re Baxter Travenol Labs., 952 F.2d 388, 392, 21 USPQ2d 1281, 1285 (Fed. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:14 pm by Tiffany Chiao
KGO-AM, November 30, 2010 Host Ed Baxter http://www.kgoradio.com/ (Link no longer active. [read post]