Search for: "In re E.-J. Children" Results 281 - 300 of 652
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that the exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:23 am by MBettman
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) (“[N]either the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone. [read post]
DHS is also proposing extending employment authorization eligibility for the following nonimmigrant categories: Dependents of Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO) E-1 nonimmigrants; J-2 dependent children of J-1 exchange visitors; Dependents of A-1 and A-2 foreign government officials; Dependents of G-1, G-3, and G-4 international organization officials; and Dependents of NATO officials. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
Thus, where a grand jury's subpoena, given its overbreadth, would itself violate the privacy interests protected by the Fourth Amendment, `[j]udicial supervision is properly exercised in such cases to prevent the wrong before it occurs. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 6:23 pm by Chuck Cosson
  More detailed codes, such as the Dewey decimal system,[11] allowed more efficient searching for a specific work, though these required much organizational work up front to label the works (and re-stacking by librarians to maintain the catalogue according to the code). [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 5:22 pm by Bill Marler
Persons with severe diarrhea often require re-hydration, usually with intravenous fluids. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Paul Chan and his wife, Frieda Hui, were found to have defamed Carl Lu and his two children in 2011. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
A very helpful and interesting paper by my colleague Sam Bray — one of the nation’s top remedies scholars — which he kindly agreed to let me pass along (also available in PDF here): equity, n. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Barnett of the University of Georgia Law School and Christopher J. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am by INFORRM
If the interim injunction stands, newspaper articles will continue to appear re-cycling the contents of the redacted judgment and calling upon PJS to identify himself. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Women and children appeared to be among the victims. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
Summary: This discussion paper is intended to address the following question put forward in the OPC’s consultation paper on online reputation: “Can the right to be forgotten find application in the Canadian context and, if so, how? [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
  The Court of Appeals prefaced its analysis of both arguments with the comment that “[w]e disagree with his first contention but agree with his second. [read post]