Search for: "In re GREEN et al."
Results 281 - 300
of 375
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Boston Scientific (Docket Report)(271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Allegation that plaintiff ‘buried’ prior art in IDS is sufficient to state of claim for inequitable conduct: CIVIX-DDI LLC v National Association of Realtors et al (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Attorney delinquence excuses 7 year delay in reviving expired patent: SprinGuard Technology Group Inc. v USPTO (271 Patent Blog) District Court Wyoming: Filing a patent on behalf of a… [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am
Thompson, et al., “Enhancing the ecological risk assessment process,” 4 Integrated Envt’l Assess. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
(BLOG@IP::JUR) CAFC Judge Rader: ‘Stronger IP system allows countries to compete in world marketplace’ (PatentlyBIOtech) Professor Mossoff’s historical paper about patent thickets, patent trolls and patent pools: relevant today (IP Dragon) The balance between standards and patent regulation (IP Frontline) Patents in a bear market (IP Solutions) Australia Full Federal Court: Commonsense approach to trade mark use and the beer/wine dichotomy confirmed:… [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Chubin et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:18 am
The latest ruling framing the "Dukes effect" is Easterling, et al. v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:57 am
The refusal cites documentsD1: TSAI D-M ET AL: "The evaluation of normalized cross correlations for defect detection", PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, ELSEVIER, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 24, no. 15, November 2003, pages 2525-2535D2: TSAI D-M ET AL: "Fast normalized cross correlation for defect detection", PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, ELSEVIER, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 24, no. 15, November 2003, pages 2625-2631D3: R. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
SUPREME COURT IN HIAWATHA HENRY ET AL VS. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
L. 807-811 (2011).Thomas, Seth M., et al. 2009-2010 environmental law survey. 44 Ind. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm
These elevated rates, DOL has now ordered, must also be considered the going rate for cases involving the sponsorship of noncitizens for employment-based green cards under the PERM labor certification rules. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm
These elevated rates, DOL has now ordered, must also be considered the going rate for cases involving the sponsorship of noncitizens for employment-based green cards under the PERM labor certification rules. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 10:46 am
Companies with existing policies would be well advised to re-examine them with a focus on determining whether the values they promote are being achieved and, more importantly, accurately portrayed in any public company reports or statements. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
Because they’re banks, that’s why… and these days, banks and fraud are like bees and honey, don’t you know. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am
Green, W. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
JESUSA ACOSTA et al, No. 13-0576; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-13-00110-CV, 406 SW3d 711, 06-26-13); stay order issued August 9, 2013, lifted THE FREDERICKSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:03 pm
They tested both for specific human pathogens, such as Salmonella and O157:H7 E. coli, and for generic E. coli, which is required for members of the California Leafy Green Handlers Marketing Agreement (CA LGMA). [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:00 am
Both administrations authorized expansion for oil production while at the same time promoting green jobs. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:18 pm
In terms of sex offenders, even studies with intense follow-up that do not depend on convictions do not reveal massive numbers of reoffences (Marshall & Barbaree, 1988; Marques et al., 1994). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.Deatherage, Scott D., et al. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
A post at Biomass Mag on the latest Gevo/Butamax court decision includes the text:According the SEC filing, the court ruling is not material to the business of Gevo and is not material to any of the company’s other pending litigation cases with Butamax.A press release issued by Butamax notes that the court granted its summary judgment motion for invalidity of the [Gevo] ‘375 patent,Hmmm, a ruling that claims of a U.S. patent to Gevo are invalid is "not material to the business of Gevo"? … [read post]
