Search for: "Jack Broad"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,222
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2009, 11:34 am
Bender and Jack A. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 8:39 am
Trump’s broad interpretation of executive authority is novel and is likely to be tested if a court battle ensues over whether he could be ordered to answer questions. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm
Quite the contrary: as Jack and others have explained, the Administration’s bill sweeps far more broadly than the President’s remarks. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:06 pm
This move has broad cross-party support. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 11:15 pm
Current changes in these laws offer broad interpretations, encompassing such recent news as the Leandra’s Law, and Jack Shea’s law which eases restrictions on collecting blood in intoxication cases. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 12:05 pm
Enlarge / Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey (and his COVID beard?) [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 4:18 pm
The Presidency would have passed to his Vice-President, John Nance “Cactus Jack” Garner, who was a conservative Southern Democrat. [read post]
29 May 2011, 2:59 am
We cannot compete if that definition is too broad, and we are going to disappoint a sophisticated readership base if we leave too much out. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
Assembly Series Schedule Jack Devine Sept. 16 “The Importance and Ethics of National Intelligence” 5 p.m., Steinberg Hall AuditoriumBackground information Sherrilyn Ifill Sept. 17 “From Brown to Ferguson: The Unfinished Business of Civil Rights” Noon, Anheuser-Busch Hall, Bryan Cave Moot CourtroomBackground information Roderick Ferguson Sept. 29 “The University and the Combinations of Heart and Mind”… [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 1:27 pm
In 1998, Marler Clark was formed by the unlikely pairing of Bill Marler, who represented the victims in the 1993 Jack-in-the-Box E. coli Outbreak, and Bruce Clark, who defended the company. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 6:49 am
Hence, the perverse paradox that insulates the Court from these efforts having any meaningful political prospect.By the way, Jack wrote a clever, fun post a few years back that provides a counterfactual history of what the modern Supreme Court would have looked like had Carrington's proposal (which Jack supports) been adopted after WWII. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:55 am
After all these developments, Jack provided this summation of the current state of play: the Iran nuclear deal will almost certainly be a non-binding one that incentivizes Iran’s cooperation through sanctions relief, which President Obama can provide by exercising the broad waiver power written into the Iran sanctions. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:52 am
Maryland Court of Appeals, while Jack Martone concentrates on the argument in Roberts v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:59 am
BackgroundThis reference [Stichting Brein v Jack Frederik Wullems, acting under the name of Filmspeler, C-527/15] had arisen in the context of litigation between Dutch anti-piracy organisation Stichting Brein and Jack Frederik Wullems over the sale, by the latter and through - among other things - his site www.filmspeler.nl, of various models of a multimedia player under the name ‘filmspeler’. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 10:30 am
An employer would probably have difficulty in convincing a judge such a broad restriction is necessary to protect a reasonable competitive interest. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 10:30 am
An employer would probably have difficulty in convincing a judge such a broad restriction is necessary to protect a reasonable competitive interest. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 1:34 pm
Following Jack and Curt, I generally view RUDs as within the prerogatives of states parties. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:19 pm
Since then, the Supreme Court has repeatedly held that Congress, in regulating the national marketplace, can reach matters that when viewed in isolation may not seem to affect interstate commerce.In 2005, Justice Antonin Scalia explained that the necessary and proper clause gives Congress broad authority to ensure that its economic regulations work. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 6:03 am
It adopted language so broad that it was the legal version of Captain Jack Sparrow’s “Take what you can … Give nothing back. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 5:58 am
Collectively, the "broad command" flowing from these cases requires federal courts "to apply state substantive law and federal procedural law. [read post]
