Search for: "MATTER OF L K" Results 281 - 300 of 1,746
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2016, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“J,” “K,” or “L” violations mean that a nursing facility is in immediate jeopardy, and is in risk of being cut-off from Medicare reimbursement. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:51 pm
In keeping with the flexible nature of the obviousness inquiry, KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:55 am
Salzburg, Attorney General; Michael L. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 9:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
 Article 5(3)(k) of the InfoSoc Directive would be consistent with this interpretation, and the judgment in Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds, C-201/13 would demonstrate that. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The ED refused this request inter alia for lack of clarity:“… The applicant also amended the characterizing portion of claim 1 in an attempt to define the subject matter of the invention with respect to a second, unclaimed entity, namely human teeth. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 7:24 am by The White Law Group
The requested information from the SEC has primarily related to GWG Holdings’ investment products, including its L Bonds, as well as various accounting matters. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 2:42 pm by Stephen Page
Property settlement might not be able to be determined until the children's matter is sorted out. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
Tags: Recognition & Enforcement, Int'l Regulatory & Enforcement, Sequencing Dispute Resolution, International Practice, Subject-Matter Jurisdiction, Adjudication Related posts The Principal-Agency Conundrum For Securing U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:07 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
J is for Junk Fees K is for Kidnapped Children L is for Life Insurance M is for Miscellaneous Income – Want more taxgirl goodness? [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
However, according to A 84, the claims must define the matter for which protection is sought. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
However, the initial silicate concentration […] according to claim 6 of the patent is limited to “at most 15 g/l” whereas the independent process claim 1 of the application as filed only requires a value “less than 20 g/l”. [2.2] In application of the principle restated in T 925/98 [2] the Board considers that a limiting amendment consisting in a replacement of the upper limit “less than 20 g/l” of said range by the limit… [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 6:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Matter of Blatt 2023 NY Slip Op 04120 Decided on August 2, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Per Curiam is both a common and unusual attorney story. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The fact that in claim 2 now only one herbicide (B) is required only corresponds to the abandonment of part of the claimed subject-matter and does not generate a new subgroup that has not been originally disclosed (see T 615/95 [6]). [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
However, this does not alter the fact that the request raised new issues that were not resolvable during the OPs.The [patent proprietor] finally argued that the subject-matter of the seventh auxiliary request did not diverge from the subject-matter previously claimed and that therefore the seventh auxiliary request should be admitted. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:59 am by Dan Bressler
Yet, her analysis found that WhatsApp ‘has not demonstrated that the two matters are substantially related and absent such a relationship, there is no presumption that K&S acquired material confidential information.'” “Morgan Lewis DQ Reversed In Calif. [read post]