Search for: "Majors v. US Air, Inc."
Results 281 - 300
of 729
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm
The Ninth Circuit US Court of Appeals held (2-1) that the trial court had committed reversible error. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:45 pm
As Justice Breyer wrote for the majority in that case:Here, the Congress that wrote the language before us copied the language of the air-carrier pre-emption provision of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Air Control Bd., 852 4 S.W.2d 440, 446 (Tex. 1993). [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
The lead opinion by Justice Gorsuch is partly for a majority and partly for a plurality. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
If that's the case, the Court's ruling in Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:06 pm
Fresenius USA, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am
This article was sponsored by the United States Air Force, a Presidential Young Investiga- tor Award, and Motorola, Inc. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Schaefer v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Full disclosure – Bexis filed a brief for PLAC in Phillips on the Restatement Third issue.While three justices aren’t a majority of Pennsylvania’s seven-member Supreme Court, in Phillips they outnumbered the court’s Azzarello supporters 3-2 (there was a vacancy and an obscure concurrence in the result). [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 6:58 am
But the Supreme Court later in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc, decided that with corrective measures (in Sutton the issue were corrective lenses) to mitigate the plaintiff’s impairment did not substantially limit a major life activity and therefore they were not disabled. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 6:58 am
But the Supreme Court later in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc, decided that with corrective measures (in Sutton the issue were corrective lenses) to mitigate the plaintiff’s impairment did not substantially limit a major life activity and therefore they were not disabled. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:32 pm
Forest Service Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 5:23 am
Supreme Court’s decision in New York Rife and Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 1:29 pm
HCP, Inc., 647 F.3d 291, 328 n.15 (6th Cir. 2011 (quoting and following Combs); Kurczi v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
(AEP) v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
* The test used by Woodbridge for this evaluation was discontinue as the company had concerns as to its reliability. ** In Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc., 527 US 471, the Supreme Court suggested, but did not specifically hold, that working was a major life activity *** Relying on Mathews' physician's statement, the Post did not allow Mathews to work during this period. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:18 pm
Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am
A new report released earlier this month revealed in greater detail the energy that can be derived from used plastics through a process called pyrolysis.Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:30 am
"The bill also would override the Court's unanimous ruling in Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
