Search for: "Matter of Clark v Clark" Results 281 - 300 of 1,890
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2021, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
Further, the retainer agreements between plaintiff and the insured govern this dispute, which provides a further basis for affirming the order (Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Political speech enjoys the highest level of protection on both sides of the Atlantic, as it is supposed to realise the main goal of freedom of expression: participation in the social discourse about public matters of the political community.[1] Restrictions of political expression should be subject to the highest scrutiny. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Richard Clarke, commander of Special Operations Command; and Gen. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:39 am by Mark Ashton
 The regulation does need to assiduously avoid “content preference,” Clark v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:39 am by Mark Ashton
 The regulation does need to assiduously avoid “content preference,” Clark v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
William Funk (Lewis & Clark), Ofer Raban (U. of Oregon), and Kyu Ho Youm (U. of Oregon); and bloggers Prof. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
The decision of Mr Justice Jay in Soriano v Forensic News LLC  [2021] EWHC 56 (QB) is interesting in a number of respects but in particular for its analysis of the circumstances in which the GDPR will apply to a publisher (or indeed any data controller/processor) based outside of the EU. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Rather than file a response to Giustra’s claim, Twitter sought to have the matter dismissed out of B.C. courts, arguing that California, where Twitter has its headquarters, would be the correct jurisdiction but its arguments were rejected. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
” JUNE The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California filed an emergency lawsuit on behalf of Black Lives Matter Los Angeles and several individuals to challenge the nightly curfews imposed by Los Angeles city and county. [read post]