Search for: "Matter of Crawford" Results 281 - 300 of 1,015
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  If yes, the law is little changed as a practical matter, and the same people will be convicted, by and large. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm by Jessica Smith
The Court noted that as a historical matter, there is strong evidence that similar statements were admissible at common law. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Crawford initiated a lawsuit naming the City of New York and certain “John Does” as defendants. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:22 pm by Giles Peaker
Thanks to Caroline Crawford of Shelter, who was Ms C’s McKenzie friend for pointing us to this case. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:08 am by Tammy Binford
” Kennedy continued that those who differ on same-sex marriage “whether as a matter of religious conviction or secular belief” may engage in “an open and searching debate. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:24 am
The Onion reports:AKRON, OH — Squandering the authority and respect accumulated during his tenure, Pantheon Systems senior manager Robert Crawford, 52, reportedly had his clout instantly evaporate Thursday upon his being seen wearing shorts at the company’s annual summer picnic. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"In many situations, the new approach to the confrontation clause (beginning with Crawford in 2004) lets LESS hearsay in. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
  But the fact is that the majority opinion deals entirely within the Crawford framework. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
  But the fact is that the majority opinion deals entirely within the Crawford framework. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am by Maureen Johnston
Ohio 14-1008Issue: Whether an autopsy report created as part of a homicide investigation, and asserting that the death was caused by homicide, is “testimonial” under the Confrontation Clause framework established in Crawford v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:31 pm
City of Seattle, 55 F.3d 436, 439 (9th Cir. 1995) (recognizing a “First Amendment right to film matters of public interest”; the plaintiff was filming the activities of police officers at a protest). [read post]