Search for: "Mr Mitchell" Results 281 - 300 of 853
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Eleonora recounts Mr Justice Arnold’s version, which he gave at the 1st iCLIC conference on the role of internet intermediaries in the law enforcement process at the University of Southampton.* IP: When innovation is the answer to a spiritual funkIn IP’s youthful golden age (ie, the 1980s), IP professionals believed that IP would ultimately be omnipresent as a force for doing creative and inventive good. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Finally, it has been announced that four new Lords Justices of Appeal will be appointed this autumn – Mr Justice Hamblen, Mr Justice Lindblom, Mr Justice (David) Richards and Mr Justice Simon. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 3:26 am by INFORRM
 There has not been a trial of such a claim since the Mitchell case in November 2014. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
  Judge Mitchell Beckloff entered default judgment for the plaintiff Karen Monroe. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm by MBettman
This In Sharper Focus Guest Post by Cleveland attorney Harlan D. [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:32 pm
 Therefore, in determining whether the watercourse was navigable in 1831, Justice Mitchell could rely on the present navigability of the watercourse.She concluded: "The depth of the watercourse is presently and, based on the evidence of Mr. [read post]
16 May 2015, 10:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Mitchell might want to consult the following:**As to the work of Prof. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:28 am by Nick Hilborne, Litigation Futures
Alida Coates, partner in the asbestos-related disease team at Irwin Mitchell, acted for the McDonald family. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm by Giles Peaker
HHJ Mitchell also observed that the merits of the appeal did not seem at all strong. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 6:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Family Lawyer said the petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to Article 78 of the CPLR to review a determination of the respondent, City of New York, Department of Housing Preservation and Development (hereafter referred to as "HPD"), which purported to deny Petitioner's appeal for family succession rights pursuant to 28 RCNY§3-02(p) concerning a Mitchell-Lama apartment Petitioner occupies with his wife and nine children. [read post]