Search for: "Novelty, Inc."
Results 281 - 300
of 766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2016, 6:25 am
My Other Bag , Inc., No. 14-CV-3419 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 11:33 am
Patent Application No. 20150249280, titled Fuel Cell System to Power a Portable Computing Device and assigned to Apple Inc. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:37 am
See Prolitec, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 8:40 pm
Market Leader, Inc. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:04 pm
During that period, she received home care services from defendant Rockaway Home Attendant Services, Inc., a licensed home care services agency. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
The invalidity attacks covered almost the full range of grounds: obviousness, lack of novelty, lack of entitlement to priority, and added matter, as well as insufficiency.There was no dispute that, if the patent were found valid, Merck's proposed dealings in its product for treating metastasised or non-removable melanoma would infringe. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:10 am
Multi Time Machine, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:14 pm
In particular, all seven High Court judges found that claims 1-3 of Myriad Genetics’ Australian patent no. 686004, each of which is directed to isolated nucleic acid molecules corresponding with the BRCA mutation associated with increased breast cancer risk, are invalid because they do not define a patent-eligible ‘manner of manufacture’ under Australian law: D'Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2015] HCA 35.In arriving at this ruling, the High Court has reversed the… [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:59 am
Funeral Homes, Inc., September 24, 2015, Grand, D.). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:11 pm
QXQ Inc. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 5:52 pm
Sequenom, Inc. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 2:15 pm
With increased activity regarding proposed federal trade secrets legislation expected next month and for the remainder of the fall Congressional session, Seyfarth Shaw’s dedicated Trade Secrets/Non-Compete group has created a resource which summarizes the proposed legislation, outlines the arguments in favor of and against the legislation, and provides additional resources for our readers’ convenience. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:03 am
That means that other parties will not be hindered in developing technologies which also make use of the same judicial exception.Ariosa Diagnostics v SequenomAriosa Diagnostics, Inc. v Sequenom, Inc., No. 2014-1139 (Fed. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:12 pm
As a result, the court upheld as reasonable the Board’s conclusion that the employer unlawfully withdrew recognition from the union immediately upon the relocation of the mechanics, prior to any effects bargaining (Dodge of Naperville, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 9:10 am
by David Hricik Over on the main page, Dennis has done a good job laying out the court’s “analysis” in Versata v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:22 pm
Amscan Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:44 am
PCCare247 Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 6:14 pm
While the EPO does claim to use a novelty test, the guidelines do indeed stress that an explicit disclosure is not necessary, and, especially in priority questions there is a body of case-law that talks about having the same idea, i.e. again not quite explicit disclosure. [read post]
