Search for: "Null v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2012, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" Then, at ¶ 11, he states, "I am immune from your dishonorable illegal order that is unconstitutional and therefore is null and void and is in effect under lock and key [sic]. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:46 pm by Schachtman
A failure to reject the null hypothesis does not prove the null such that we can say that the “null results” in one study were perfectly consistent with chance. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 7:05 am by Patricia Salkin
Miranda Holdings, Inc v Town Board of Town of Orchard Park, 2017 WL 2884633 (NYAD 4 Dept. 7/7/2017)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Environmental Review [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On July 12, 2019, defendants, on behalf of plaintiffs, commenced a hybrid Article 78  proceeding captioned Ressler v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Reducing or discontinuing a NYSHIP participating employer's contributions towards a retired employee's health insurance premiumWeaver, et al, v Town of N. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 8:57 am by Frank Crivelli
  On July 23, 2009, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division issued its opinion in the case of James Liik, et al v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:12 pm by Bartolus
So holds the Court of Justice in its judgment in Case C-63/08 Virginie Pontin v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am by Frank Cranmer
Without a doubt, he states, the canons provide for how a bishop is appointed and for how disputes relating to the election of bishops are resolved: “Courts cannot appoint a bishop for the Church. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:45 am
In Weeks v State of New York, 198 AD2d 615, the court held that the statute of limitations begins to run when the decision is served on the employee, not from the date on which the union received its copy.The basic rule:1. [read post]