Search for: "Olson v. District Court" Results 281 - 300 of 558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm by Josh Blackman
Writers at Slate and Vox push out a never-ending series of attacks on a handful of district court judges in Texas. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:59 pm
District Court rejects Second Amendment claim from misdemeanant Updates on post-Heller Second Amendment litigation Justice Scalia sells out felon gun rights, but on what basis exactly? [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 9:37 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Texas Posting Family Photos to Facebook With Snarky Comments Isn’t Harassment of Family Member — Olson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:24 pm by WSLL
Olson, Appellate Counsel; David E. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:30 am by SHG
A petition for cert has been filed by UC Irvine Dean Erwin Chemerinsky to argue the case against Orleans Parish District Attorney Harry Connick that, if one is to believe the majority in Thompson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:54 am by Ray Forbess
  Apple has retained the services of renowned lawyer Theodore Olson who successfully represented then republican candidate George Bush in the Bush v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 12:32 am
United States District Court (the energy task force case) arguably says that absent a criminal prosecution, the courts will not override a claim of executive privilege. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:32 am by WSLL
Olson, Appellate Counsel; Eric M. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:20 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which spurned a similar challenge in 2018 in a case called PHH Corporation v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:03 pm by WSLL
Olson, Appellant Counsel; David E. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:27 am by WSLL
Holdings:  The Court found that because the district court appeared to have overlooked the question of presumptive prejudice and because no evidence was offered by the prosecution to rebut the presumption of prejudice afforded to Appellant, the Court must conclude that the district court erred in denying Appellant’s motion to dismiss based upon a violation of his constitutional speedy trial right. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:06 am by WSLL
Holdings: The Court found that because the district court appeared to have overlooked the question of presumptive prejudice and because no evidence was offered by the prosecution to rebut the presumption of prejudice afforded to Appellant, the Court must conclude that the district court erred in denying Appellant’s motion to dismiss based upon a violation of his constitutional speedy trial right. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:34 pm by WSLL
CiteID=465265Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, Honorable Dan R. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:34 pm by WSLL
Olson, Appellate Counsel; Kirk A. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 6:56 pm by Mitu Gulati
Before the arguments began, I was inclined to think that the First Circuit would take the safe route by affirming the district court and rejecting Aurelius’ challenge. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
In response, Olson alluded to the existence of fair use exceptions that would apply. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
In response, Olson alluded to the existence of fair use exceptions that would apply. [read post]