Search for: "One Source Employer Services Plan"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2016, 10:25 am
One of your grown children may be the perfect candidate for guardian. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:15 am
The statement indicates that “Wayne County will extend to its employees all protections afforded to them under the applicable State and federal Whistleblower laws including the Federal False Claims Act, the New York State False Claims Act and the New York State Civil Service Law.The statement notes that New York State Civil Service Law [Civil Service Law §75-B] prohibits the public employers from dismissing or taking other disciplinary or other adverse… [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 10:00 am
Friends, family and other professional advisors are trustworthy sources. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:05 am
As one observer astutely commented: If you couch strategy in terms of fluffy positives like vision, mission, and values, no one’s feelings are hurt, no one has to undertake the onerous work of analyzing the firm’s difficult challenges, and no hard decisions have to be made. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 6:53 am
I know that handling a lawsuit is not on the plans of any small business owner. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 8:14 am
Many large insurers make substantial "administrative services only" revenue--for example, by administering self-insured employers' plans. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 2:00 am
The ER is the most expensive source of care and is often unnecessary. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:38 am
The goal is to provide for industrial/service employment for agricultural laborers in areas close to their current residence. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 7:02 am
You can save through your employer’s retirement or pension plan. [read post]
31 May 2019, 2:00 am
Today, more employers than ever offer their employees a consumer-driven health plan with a health savings account (HSA) as part of their benefits package. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 6:00 am
The reporting tool is on ServiceOntario’s ONe-Source for Business website. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 12:40 pm
If you find this of interest, you also be interested reviewing some of our other Solutions Law Press resources including: CMS Publishes Proposed Consumer Disclosure Notices Detailing Required Health Insurer Rate Increase Justification Disclosures Avoiding Liability For Another’s Health Plan Fraud 4/19 Deadline For Comments On Proposed Rules For Selecting State Employment Service Delivery Systems Providers For Veterans Health Plans &… [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 1:00 am
Selected federal documents below from Gallery Watch.com may include references to government reporrts, Congressional letters, draft bills, and other primary source materials. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
And that turns out to be a very complex question, one that might well turn on whether federal law imposes substantial pressure on the company directors to choose to retain their employee health insurance plans. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
Civil Service Employees Ass'n, 8 N.Y.3d 513, “Once such an informed decision as to which positions are to be [abolished] is made, §80(1) obligates the employer to respect the seniority rights of its employees. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
Civil Service Employees Ass'n, 8 N.Y.3d 513, “Once such an informed decision as to which positions are to be [abolished] is made, §80(1) obligates the employer to respect the seniority rights of its employees. [read post]
21 May 2013, 4:56 am
Much like an employer sponsored health or retirement plan, despite the obvious competitive advantage to the employer in attracting qualified employees, coverage is a cost. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:15 am
For example, the Service Contract Act (“SCA”), 41 U.S.C. chapter 67, is applicable to certain Federal contracts and subcontracts that utilize service employees to furnish services in the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:00 pm
Bhatt was a Member of the Indian Parliament from 1986 to 1989, and subsequently a Member of the Indian Planning Commission. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Termination of "over-65" retired former county employees reemployed on a part-time basis did not violate the Age Discrimination in Employment ActCarson v Lake County, Indiana, USCA, 7th Circuit, No. 16-3665 Source: Article by Kathleen Kapusta, J.D. posted in Employment Law News from WK WorkDayAge was a necessary but insufficient factor in a county’s decision to terminate part-time rehired retirees who were 65 years old or older, the Seventh Circuit stated,… [read post]
