Search for: "People v. Thomas (2001)"
Results 281 - 300
of 357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 1:04 am
Thomas Badian, who headed the investment firm that shorted Sedona's shares, was charged with fraud by the SEC, and was indicted on criminal charges. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:58 am
He warns, quoting Justice Thomas from Chicago v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 6:24 am
Oddly enough, "no one has noticed any steep decline in the ambition of able people to serve in Congress as a consequence of the lousy pay. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 10:29 am
Note: Commenter Åsk Dabitch reminded me I omitted the Kelly v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
I was called unpatriotic for opposing the civil liberties violations in the so-called PATRIOT Act of 2001. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
., often says little; Clarence Thomas never says anything. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
., often says little; Clarence Thomas never says anything. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
Justice Kennedy was joined by Justices Roberts, Thomas and Alito in full. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
See California v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:20 am
In Warren v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Some of you may recall that during last Term’s oral arguments in Brown v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Thomas Carper, a Democrat who is now a U.S. senator. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 1:01 am
Rating: 4/5 Published by Oxford University Press, 2001 [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:37 pm
Int’l L. 29, by professor Susan Tiefenbrun of the Thomas Jefferson School of Law, attributes the term’s coming to relevance to a 2001 essay by Major General Charles J. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm
Environmental organizations argue that according to the Clean Air Act -- and reinforced by a 2001 Supreme Court decision in Whitman v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:17 am
However, the legal landscape with respect to this aspect may have changed a bit with the decision in Helicopter Association International v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
By Amnesty International’s count, since 2001 over 500 people have died in the US as a result of Taser use. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
