Search for: "Public Service Co. v. Johnson" Results 281 - 300 of 525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2018, 4:01 am by Administrator
Bell Telephone Co. of Canada(1904), [1905] A.C. 52, [1905] 1 Olmsted 505, Régie des services publics c. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 1:12 pm by Schachtman
Johnson, 400 F.3d at 696 (citing and quoting from Coleman v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: 13-14 July - WIPO conference on IP and public policy - climate change; food security, public health (WIPO) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) ECJ: National emblem rules apply to service mark applications too: American Clothing v OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) (Excess Copyright)… [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Techdirt) OHIM payments and bank charges (Class 46) (Class 46)   Finland Department store Stockmann seeks amicable settlement in trade mark dispute over clothing boutique Crazy’s use of identical mark HULLUT PÄIVÄT (crazy days) for bargain sale (Class 46)   France Cheese manufacturers press French government to place import duties on Coca-Cola syrup in retaliation for punitive American duty levelled on US imports of Roquefort cheese (IPKat)  … [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
He has mentored Chicago Public Schools students including co-leading the University of Chicago-Kenwood Academy program for academic exploration. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Morgan Stanley & Co International Plc v Tael One Partners Ltd, heard 17 November 2014. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 6:55 am by Richard Hunt
It is likely true, as defendants claimed, that Johnson had no intention of using the goods and services of the defendant, but the 9th Circ [read post]
16 May 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
District Court for the Southern District of New York in which the judge talks about “how the Supreme Court’s recent Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 08a0595n.06 Michael Johnson v. [read post]