Search for: "STATE v. SY"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Sys., 847 P.2d 440, 451 (Wash. 1993)). [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:49 am
” SciMed Life Sys. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:13 am
Sys. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:45 am
Overrule Two-Step Process: The two-step test defined in KSM Fastening Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:48 am
Epic Sys. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:48 am
Epic Sys. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 9:52 am
Iatric Sys., Inc., No. 8:14-CV-2685, 2015 WL 3883958, at *2 (M.D. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:16 am
FedEx Ground Package Sys. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Consequently, "overtime [*2]payments are not duly authorized or considered as salary within the meaning of General Municipal Law § 90 unless paid pursuant to 'an overtime plan setting forth in detail the terms, conditions and remuneration for such employment' " (Matter of Shames v Regan, 132 AD2d 743, 744 [3d Dept 1987] [emphasis omitted], quoting Matter of Murray v Levitt, 47 AD2d at 269; see Matter of Mowry v New York… [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Consequently, "overtime [*2]payments are not duly authorized or considered as salary within the meaning of General Municipal Law § 90 unless paid pursuant to 'an overtime plan setting forth in detail the terms, conditions and remuneration for such employment' " (Matter of Shames v Regan, 132 AD2d 743, 744 [3d Dept 1987] [emphasis omitted], quoting Matter of Murray v Levitt, 47 AD2d at 269; see Matter of Mowry v New York… [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 11:00 pm
. *** SRI Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:22 am
Pyott v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Hearing officer's applying an incorrect standard in making his or her determination requires the remanding of the matter for a new hearingMcGowan v New York State & Local Police & Fire Retirement Sys., 2017 NY Slip Op 01751, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentJames K. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:30 am
Sys. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:55 am
See also Checkpoint Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 4:20 am
” “Here, the defendants met their burden by establishing, prima facie, that they did not fail to exercise the requisite skill and knowledge in their representation of the plaintiff (see Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP v Telecommunications Sys., Inc. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:02 am
Sys. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:14 pm
See Li v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:28 am
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit 1973); Cadapult Graphic Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:45 pm
Bank v.Atlantic States v. [read post]