Search for: "Sara B" Results 281 - 300 of 420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 7:09 am by Legal Beagle
In the wake of the revelations of tax efficient payments to Mr Hume, attention has now turned to denials of such payments from the Scottish Government, where recently, Scotland’s Finance Secretary John Swinney was asked by Drew Smith MSP (Glasgow) (Scottish Labour): “To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has paid a salary to any (a) civil servant, (b) official, (c) consultant or (d) contractor via a (i) private company or (b) other arrangement for reasons of tax… [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Singer Cardi B’s defamation suit against YouTuber Latasha Kebe began this week, with Cardi B testifying herself. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:15 am by Julio César Córdoba
., sala I, 29/12/09, B., N. s. sucesión ab intestato [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 4:49 am by Ben
The proposed changes include (a) new provisions for private agreements for the ownership of copyrights - in particular between employer and employee (b) new provisions to govern the administration and regulation of  collection societies and (c) new provisions that would move China on from calculating damages based on the  actual loss suffered by the right holder to a more flexible system that would include 'account for profit' and/or fixed damages up to RMB 1 million. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
 BlummHomewaters: A Human and Natural History of Puget Sound (2022) by David B. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under section 271(f):… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
Under the current version of Rule 26(a)(2)(B), the scope of required disclosure in the expert report has been narrowed in some respects. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:00 am by Kristofer Michaud
Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention, which states that “the judicial or administrative authority of the requested State is not bound to order the return of the child if the person, institution or other body which opposes its return establishes that there is a grave risk that his or her return would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation. [read post]