Search for: "State v. Lilly"
Results 281 - 300
of 910
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm
Germany v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:19 am
As the AmeriKat was busy getting to grips with Mr Justice Arnold's decision in the latest Lilly v Actavis case (see here), she relied on the talented (and ever succinct) Eibhlin Vardy (A&O), to analyze the decision. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:59 pm
Read with a plummy Joanna Lumley voice, Mr Arnold's decision in Actavis v Lilly [2016] EWHC 234 may be just the thing to set the mood for a romantic candlelight dinner (although, some may say it is a mood killer depending what side you are on). [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
Never too late 78 [week ending on Sunday 27 December] – Zer-sum claim and lookalike products | 2015 Copyright Awards | Santa Claus and Section 52 | Jani writes on Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited | IP Hairballs | Actavis v Eli Lilly | Power outage at USPTO | Santa's GC resigns | Pet rock and IP. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:44 am
Eli Lilly and Co., January 13, 2016, Van Antwerpen, F.). [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Such was the story in Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 2:30 pm
This morning the Court heard argument in Fisher v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:38 pm
Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:34 am
In Cubist v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
The patent therefore stated that inhibition of PD-1 or PD-L1 was effective in treating cancer.Claim breadth As well as deciding there was a clear and unambiguous disclosure, Birss J considered priority from the point of view of plausibility and claim breadth. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 11:41 am
Oct. 19, 2015) (15 plaintiffs from 11 states); DeCrane v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:30 am
LILLIS, No. 13-0596 . [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 58 F. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:35 pm
Part IV discusses the pending Eli Lilly v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
The case is Hill v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am
” Hirshman repeatedly describes O’Connor’s opinions on the Court as “tightfisted,” and she laments that, “[o]f all the hurdles the states thought up to discourage women in the years from her first abortion decision in 1983 to [Planned Parenthood v.] [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:37 am
See Orr v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Subsequently, in Centre Ice Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm
Addressing the merits of the Title VII claim, the district court determined that his claim was controlled by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Johnson v Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County, California (480 U.S. 616 (1987)), and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v Weber (20 EPD ¶30,026 (1979). [read post]
