Search for: "Verizon, Inc." Results 281 - 300 of 843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2007, 6:19 pm
"  The Court did hold, however, that the 2004 Amendments had overturned Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 10:21 am by lennyesq
Related articles Tweaked iPhone 4 parts video pulled from YouTube ‘due to a copyright claim from Apple, Inc. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:37 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Verizon N.Y., Inc., 252 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2001), helps plaintiffs, as the district court said, and the Court of Appeals (Pooler, Wesley and Carney) agrees, stating that "Plaintiffs' claims were all based upon the terms of the contracts between Plaintiffs and Defendants, the circumstances under which the commissions were earned, and the formula by which Plaintiffs were paid. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:06 pm by Peter Eckersley
Many of them agree that we need the Federal Communication Commission's rules to protect our privacy online, and seventeen of them have written to Congress today to express their concerns.The situation before the FCC’s intervention was succinctly described in the fine print of Verizon’s privacy policy:  “If you do not want information collected for marketing purposes from services such as the Verizon Wireless Mobile Internet services, you should not use… [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 5:42 am by Deb Givens
During a two-week trial in December, T-Mobile and Sprint argued the merger will better equip the new company to compete with top players Verizon Communications Inc and AT&T Inc as the third-largest U.S. wireless carrier, creating a more efficient company with low prices and faster internet speeds. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:30 am by Molly DiBianca
PMSI, Inc., the plaintiff sued her former employer for pregnancy discrimination. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:01 am
Apr. 2, 2010); In the Matter of the Search of Yahoo, Inc., Crim. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 2:49 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Verizon N.Y, Inc.,252 F.3d 163, 169 (2d Cir. 2001)). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:37 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  In Order No. 30, ALJ Gildea denied Cablevision’s motion for summary determination of no violation of Section 337 based on Complainants Verizon Communications, Inc. and Verizon Services Corp. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 8:19 am
On January 26, 2010, the Federal Communications Commission sent letters to AT&T, Sprint, Verizon Communications, Inc., T-Mobile USA Inc. and Google, Inc., asking whether they give customers adequate notice about early termination fees. [read post]