Search for: "SUMMERS v. STATE" Results 2981 - 3000 of 5,455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2011, 4:21 am by NL
Barking & Dagenham LBC v Bakare, Imevbore & Imevbore. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:21 am by NL
Barking & Dagenham LBC v Bakare, Imevbore & Imevbore. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
(Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSBlog discussed this case last summer soon after the court agreed to hear it; oral arguments will happen January 11. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm by jak4
To the more contemporary antitrust matter: Conclusions of Law and Order: United States of America v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 11:30 am by Smita Ghosh
”In the London Review of Books, Andrew Bacevich covers The General v. the President: MacArthur and Truman at the Brink of Nuclear War by H.W. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:36 pm by Jon Gelman
Both the State of Florida and the State of California have utilized this tactic.Senate Bill No. 374 is step forward to help injured workers and their families. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 8:12 am by John Jascob
By the summer of 2019, Carbonite had internally decided to stop selling VME.On July 25, 2019, Carbonite announced that VME was being withdrawn from the market. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
The Commerce Clause, in Nation and States,” at the U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:02 pm by Sheppard Mullin
R. 193, citing the Architectural Works Protection Copyright Act. [4] Id. [5] Id. [6] See generally Brandir International, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 9:52 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The court also ruled that the government cannot relitigate issues that were decided in Al Otro Lado’s favor in AOL v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 am by kblocher@hslf.org
In November 2020, the DOJ filed a complaint against big cat exhibitors Jeffrey and Lauren Lowe (of “Tiger King” fame) for AWA and Endangered Species Act violations (United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 4:42 am
 As the Court of Appeal of England and Wales stated in Murray v Big Pictures [here], this is "an objective question", "which takes account of all the circumstances of the case. [read post]