Search for: "Black v. United States"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 4,858
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Despite the vote in California, the use of the death penalty is on the decline in the United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
City of Cincinnati, 622 F.3d 524, 538 (6th Cir. 2010) (holding, in reviewing a preliminary injunction, that plaintiff had shown a likelihood of success on his claim that a restriction on speech in a nonpublic forum was unconstitutionally vague); United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:00 am
With exquisite timing, the Court of Appeals lays it out for us.The case is United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 7:00 am
However, in Wang v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
The goal of his own work then is to change not only our understanding of the origins of British North America and the United States but our sense of what it is to study and write about these things. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
United States, in which it will consider a Pennsylvania woman’s argument that the Constitution does not give Congress the power to make her conduct – an effort to poison a romantic rival – criminal, even if the federal laws in which it did so were enacted to implement an international treaty prohibiting the use and proliferation of chemical weapons. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 3:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 7:27 am
United State Postal Serv., 115 F.3d 521, 524 (7th Cir. 1997). [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
--Marvin v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:43 am
Today defense counsel to Mustafa al Hawsawi in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 7:30 am
James Gray Pope, Rutgers Law School, Newark, has posted Snubbed Landmark: How United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 2:08 pm
The United States filed a brief supporting Heimeshoff. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
United States Dep’t of Labor Bull. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:43 am
The circumstance was most apparent because the argument followed immediately upon United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
* * * “In Furman v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 4:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Black’s Law Dictionary notes the classic definition, for example: “Extortion is a crime when, by color of office, any person extorts that which is not due, or more than is due, or before the time when it is due. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:05 pm
” —New York Times Co. v. [read post]
