Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE" Results 3001 - 3020 of 3,672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2011, 5:07 am
 Of most excitement to the IPKat is a piece by a four-strong team from Allen & Overy on the absurd, unjust and (he hopes) soon to be eradicated principle which the Court of Appeal for England and Wales upheld by a 2-1 majority in Coflexip v Stolt that a patent owner can collect infringement damages even when the patent is subsequently ruled to be invalid. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm
Click here for further details.The decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Actavis UK Limited v Novartis AG -- which has the distinction of being the most-commented-upon ruling ever to have been posted on this weblog -- was bound to be the subject of an appeal. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 9:07 am by David Pocklington
This is set out as follows, in Halsbury’s Laws of England, vol 34, para 1087, fn 13: “Supporting or opposing memorials or petitions purporting to be signed by petitioners as to which there is no proof of the signatures or evidence of the representations made to those who sign are inadmissible: Rector and Churchwardens of Capel St Mary, Suffolk v Packard [1927] P 289; Re Christ Church, Chislehurst [1947] 1 All ER 146 at 150–151, [1973] 1 WLR 1317 at 1321. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 7:11 am
Family Voices members are paid staff within the Title V agency, providing information and support on health concerns to families around the state. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
  The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 5:59 pm by Steven Calabresi
We should not be imposing one-size fits all national rules on abortion, which is one of the many reasons why Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 7:52 am
They preserve the revolution precisely by transposing the revolutionary performance from outside the constitutional state (and thus a threat to it) to become a method, a performance of the revolutionary trajectories now in the service of constitutional stability, or at least solidity. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am by INFORRM
Buxton LJ, with whom Latham and Longmore LJJ agreed, stated that:- “The width of the rights given to the media by A v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm by Charon QC
‘One of the best human rights lawyers in England and Wales’ wins CILEx Pro Bono Medal At our Annual President [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am by INFORRM
– which concerns a State-sponsored dictionary and book that contained derogatory stereotypes of Roma. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In a post titled Dickens's 1842 Reading Tour: Launching the Copyright Question in Tempestuous Seas , Philip V. [read post]