Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2020, 4:27 pm
The much anticipated judgment in Depp v News Group Newspapers ([2020] EWHC 2911 (QB)) was handed down on 2 November 2020. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
In light of this, Actavis argued that there was strong motivation to develop alternative treatments at the priority date. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 2:51 pm
United States (in which the office supported sentencing reductions for certain crack-cocaine offenders). [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 5:46 am
The Minnesota Court of Appeals issued an opinion in State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:55 pm
Hoang v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:57 pm
In Haynes v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:30 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:07 pm
Div., A-2330-09T2, February 18, 2011: There is a strong public policy in this state favoring enforcement of marital settlement agreements. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:16 am
Quila & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1482 – Read judgment A key part of the government’s strategy to combat forced marriages, preventing people under the age of 21 from entering the country to marry, has been heavily criticised by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:31 pm
A white collar defendant's good deeds are put under the microscope in Judge Marrero's thoughtful decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
True, they cannot be sentenced to death for any crime, Roper v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 1:00 pm
(See Miranda v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 12:22 pm
Perry v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:52 pm
Innes, 117 N.J. 496, 518 (1990) (stating a settlement agreement should be enforced by a trial court only to the extent it is equitable and just); Miller v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 6:26 am
§ 42.8(b)(2), Petitioner states that the ’685 patent is the subject of several matters that may affect, or may be affected by a decision in this proceeding: Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:21 am
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Reed Elsevier Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:48 am
The Washington State Supreme Court, in State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:17 am
The recent case of Purdue Pharma v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 11:02 am
In Fazaga v. [read post]
