Search for: "Sample v. State"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 4,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm
Now we know, it’s a myth (IPKat) United States US General Are you small, American, IP-ish and in business? [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
United States (1998, in which Justice Breyer wrote for the majority) that first advanced the constitutional theory adopted by the Court in Apprendi v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:00 pm
" 49 CFR § 26.53 (b)(2)(v). [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 10:30 pm
As part of this investigation, FDA collected environmental samples and found the outbreak strain of Listeria. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm
Judge Gergel did not report whether Jewell’s reported p-value of 0.0654, was one- or two-sided, but he did state that the attained probability “indicates a lack of statistical significance. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm
Judge Gergel did not report whether Jewell’s reported p-value of 0.0654, was one- or two-sided, but he did state that the attained probability “indicates a lack of statistical significance. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 4:10 pm
UgandaUnwanted Witness-Uganda v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:34 am
In KSR v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:08 am
Aviva Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
The second touches on the nature of the rights of individuals and is rooted in international law (and sometimes domestic constitutional law) defining the scope of the human rights of individuals and the consequential obligations of states and legal persons. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
The expression ‘P=.05’ means that there is one chance in twenty that a result showing increased risk was caused by a sampling error—i.e., that the randomly selected sample accidentally turned out to be so unrepresentative that it falsely indicates an elevated risk. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
Here are some sample rule statements: “Once the defense of qualified immunity has been asserted, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating that (1) the official violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) the right was ‘clearly established’ at the time. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:08 pm
V. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am
This decision, Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 (discussed here), found that s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, which had been in operation for the past 36 years having been inserted by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976, was contrary to the Constitution. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 6:16 pm
The Brady Rule came out of the Brady v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 9:49 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in McCleskey v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 3:59 pm
Plummer recently stated that "I have so many teams back out of deals for so many reasons, how could I ever prove that DNA testing was one of them? [read post]
