Search for: "He v. Holder" Results 3041 - 3060 of 5,732
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2013, 8:18 pm
Category: 101   By: Eric Paul Smith, Contributor    TitleUltramercial, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
The Wiki points to a hagiographic obituary that quotes an anonymous friend who called Schepers “the Old War Horse, the record holder for longevity in the struggle against corporate crime. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am by Mary Dwyer
Holder 12-1401Issue: Whether consumers have standing to challenge the constitutionality of laws regulating the sale of firearms. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am by Amy Howe
At the Brennan Center for Justice, Andrew Cohen responds to an editorial in The Wall Street Journal that criticizes Attorney General Eric Holder and cites the Court’s decision in Crawford v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 8:03 am
  For example, the copyright holder can also sue for copyright infringement, which could increase damages by as much as $150,000. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-1493, says he was only trying to save a relative a few bucks when, to take advantage of a discount for former cops, he purchased a handgun that he intended to sell to his uncle (who was not prohibited from owning a firearm). [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm by David Markus
Attorney General Holder’s admirable leadership toward sentencing reform should lead him to refocus his attention on prior felony informations. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  He noted that our Constitution creates a government of laws, which can only be suspended by the enactment of another law. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:40 pm by Florian Mueller
Judge Holderman also compares the number he arrived at with a jury award in Ericsson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 6:33 am by Tim Sitzmann
” The proposed legislation for Minnesota (discussed here) defined trademark bullying as: “[T]he practice of a trademark holder using litigation tactics in an attempt to enforce trademark rights beyond a reasonable interpretation of the scope of the rights granted to the trademark holder. [read post]