Search for: "National Labor Relations Board, The" Results 3041 - 3060 of 8,605
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2017, 5:29 am by Daniel Schwartz
The biggest change we’ll see will come from the appointments to the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 5:48 am
Here's my feeble Twitter attempt to hit some highlights.Here are some Lawffice Links on the subject.Gale Force Winds of Change: National Labor Relations Board Reverses Course on Workplace Rules and Joint Employer Standards.Have you ever seen the former NLRB Chair and Stone Cold Steve Austin in the same room? [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 12:43 pm by Tammy Binford
The latest National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) decision reversing actions by the Obama-era Board hands employers a win against an organizing tactic that gave unions the upper hand in determining what constitutes an appropriate bargaining unit. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am by Catherine Fisk
Such cases just repackage under the First Amendment the substantive-due-process arguments made against the National Labor Relations Act in the 1930s. [read post]
It might appear that on some years, the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) issues a series of decisions just as the year comes to a close, but it is not because the Board wants to give out holiday presents (or, from the employer’s perspective for the past several years, multiple lumps of coal). [read post]
It might appear that in some years, the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) issues a series of decisions just as the year comes to a close, but it is not because the Board wants to give out holiday presents (or, from the employer’s perspective for the past several years, multiple lumps of coal). [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Adam Santucci
  That’s because the newly constituted National Labor Relations Board fired off several pro-employer decisions in the last week. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
How else can you explain what happened last week at the National Labor Relations Board? [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 4:43 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
About The Author Recognized by her peers as a Martindale-Hubble “AV-Preeminent” (Top 1%) and “Top Rated Lawyer” with special recognition LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell® as “LEGAL LEADER Texas Top Rated Lawyer” in Health Care Law and Labor and Employment Law; as among the “Best Lawyers In Dallas” for her work in the fields of “Labor & Employment,” “Tax: Erisa & Employee Benefits,” “Health… [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 4:07 pm by Danielle Garcia
Chairman Miscimarra, a frequent dissenter of decisions applying the Specialty Healthcare standard, along with newly appointed Republican Board members Kaplan and Emanuel, held that the Board had an affirmative, statutory duty under Section 9(b) of the National Labor Relations Act to determine the appropriate unit of employees in each case. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:54 am by Daniel Schwartz
Under the Lutheran Heritage standard, an employer’s facially neutral workplace rule was determined to be unlawful if it would be “reasonably construed” by an employee to prohibit or restrict the employee’s rights afforded by the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
” Following is an excerpt: It should come as no surprise that recent days have seen a stream of significant decisions and other actions from the National Labor Relations Board as Board Chairman Philip A. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 7:13 am by Joy Waltemath
Kisicki called the ruling a “very well-reasoned, scholarly critique of the original decision, grounded in decades of Board jurisprudence and court interpretations of what the National Labor Relations Act is and how it applies. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 7:11 am by Joy Waltemath
The rule potentially affected the exercise of NLRA rights, but the impact was comparatively slight and outweighed by important justifications, including national security concerns, the majority reasoned. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 7:00 am by Joy Waltemath
It accordingly found the company did not violate the National Labor Relations Act by failing to give its union advance notice and the opportunity for bargaining before making the 2013 changes. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 5:18 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
About The Author Recognized by her peers as a Martindale-Hubble “AV-Preeminent” (Top 1%) and “Top Rated Lawyer” with special recognition LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell® as “LEGAL LEADER Texas Top Rated Lawyer” in Health Care Law and Labor and Employment Law; as among the “Best Lawyers In Dallas” for her work in the fields of “Labor & Employment,” “Tax: Erisa & Employee Benefits,” “Health… [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 5:04 am by Jon Hyman
For the uninitiated, the Board, over scathing dissents by its more reasonable members and scorching critiques from business groups, applied its longstanding Lutheran Heritage rule to find that a variety of employment policies violate employees’ rights to engage in protected concerted activity under section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
-China Relations Review. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 8:50 am
My visit coincides with a dramatic change of direction in US policies relating to inequality and extreme poverty. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:31 pm by Anthony Zaller
The National Labor Relations Board issued a ruling this week that reverses the Board’s ruling issued under the Obama administration in regards to who can be held a “joint employer. [read post]