Search for: "Peters v. Doe"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 3,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2010, 10:25 pm
Li started juxtaposing research that proves that patents work to research that proves it does not. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 5:52 am
In his November 19, 2009 ruling in R. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Finkelman v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:51 pm
Peter Spiro, a noted legal academic who is a supporter of this tendency. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:27 pm
The Su Âpreme Court's decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
Of course, this does not settle the theoretical question. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:00 pm
(For additional analysis, please see Ben and Peter‘s posts.) [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
” OLC does not usually share the legal advice it provides to the president and executive branch agencies. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
Justify v. specify: lawyers deal with specification. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm
But it didn’t work to get British support for the Confederates—analogies in 301 naughty lists; nothing China does is ever enough—Peter Yu’s work? [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
What does that mean? [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:19 am
Lord Denning Jarvis v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
Garrison Architects v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Peter Jaszi: WIPO’s greatest failing may be in its educational activities, heavily weigh [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
I mean really, how often does prior art have sex appeal? [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:00 am
A few hours after the OPPO v. [read post]
