Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 51,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2008, 12:10 am
As noted here, the Third Circuit a few months ago granted rehearing en banc in US v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 10:46 am
But lest us working stiffs be deprived, here's something from a couple days ago. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:47 am
Whistleblower DQ of Assistant US Attorney Denied: “United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 10:25 am
See A & H Sportswear, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:58 pm
In Khadr v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 10:54 pm
“Don’t do it” is the friendly advice from the Ninth in Global Horizons, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 6:47 am
The colourful and provocative language used by the defendant in WIC Radio would not have been taken at face value given the nature of the ongoing public debate between the parties. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:34 pm
But I admit to having used it on occasion in the past. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
Dorsey v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 12:48 pm
Smith v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 12:53 pm
A lawsuit, Bethel v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:43 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
The issue is the authority of federal judges to consider the impact of that disparity in a given case under the federal Sentencing Guidelines. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:58 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm
Well, I use Wikipedia for research. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:25 am
Appropriately enough, I might add, given the weather there. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 1:51 pm
Given the Jewell instructions are most often used in drug and immigrant smuggling cases, I can't help wonder whether that fact played a role in the lineup.Also interesting -- and more proof that you can't always count the votes based upon who appointed the judge -- is that Judge Kleinfeld basically joins the dissent, although he formally concurs since he doesn't think that in the present case the error was plain (since the defendant didn't object). [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 7:41 am
INS v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
Given this reality and, frankly the rulemaking authority in Dodd-Frank, direct access is an inevitability. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 11:01 am
For instance, in Ross v. [read post]
