Search for: "People v. Modell" Results 3061 - 3080 of 4,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
“We continue to focus on transnational repression, where Chinese authorities have reached into the United States and other countries to repress people critical of Chinese policies. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The doubling argument derives from the well-known “urn model” in probability theory, which is not really at issue in the frequentist-Bayesian wars. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 4:01 am by Ken Chasse
” This book deals with (at pp. 35-36; 122-124) ethical conflicts such as that in Spaulding v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: Mutilation v. destruction: people do debate which is worse. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 5:49 am by Susan Brenner
As the State explained, people confronted with push technology `are not asking to see it, but it's there to view. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:27 am by Joey Fishkin
 Contrast, unfortunately, the Medicaid expansion: Congress did not anticipate the Court’s Spending Clause holding in NFIB v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  Surrounded by very intelligent people, I have always learned something I needed to know. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm by Reference Staff
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am by Chris Castle
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Judges may know who the good judges are, but judicial talent for assessing horse flesh outside the judicial arena seems more questionable.Although, as noted above, the federal judicial selection model on its face appears to be one in which Presidents and Senates pick Supreme Court Justices (but compare Bush v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:15 am
  They include1--AI should benefit people and the planet by driving inclusive growth, sustainable development and well-being.2--AI systems should be designed in a way that respects the rule of law, human rights, democratic values and diversity, and they should include appropriate safeguards – for example, enabling human intervention where necessary – to ensure a fair and just society.3--There should be transparency and responsible disclosure around AI systems to ensure that… [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:02 am by Eric
Trademark David Bernstein The Tiffany v. eBay case’s result is inconsistent with Inwood, tort principles and Inwood's progeny, but David thinks it reached the right result. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]