Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp" Results 3061 - 3080 of 4,125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 8:49 pm by Dan Markel
Whether it marks progress from Farmer v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:30 am
Its reliance on "evolving standards of decency" -- a formulation that, as I've written, derives from Weems v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 5:28 am by INFORRM
Facts On 9 March 2011 Sharp J made an order prohibiting the publication of information about a sexual relationship between the claimant (Sir Fred Goodwin, the former Chief Executive of the Royal Bank of Scotland) and a female colleague at the bank. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:51 am by Ted Frank
Scalia and Alito issued sharp dissents to the judicial aggrandizement. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, there is an oral application for permission to appeal in the case of Wallis v Meredith (an appeal from [2011] EWHC 75 (QB)) Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: El Diwany v Ministry of Justice & the Police, Norway, heard 16 March 2011 (Sharp J). [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:47 am by Steven Hansen
This was a long time in coming given that the 16 CFR 1512 standard was issued in 1978. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:33 am by Marie Louise
207/10 Orifarm v Merck and Paranova v Merck Sharp & Dohme (IPKat) EU: European Court of Justice considers embryonic stem cell ban: Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace eV (Patent Docs) India: Border push in EU FTA to hit pharma exports (GenericsWeb) US: BPAI seeks further briefing on claim encompassing “400 billion oligomers”: Ex parte DeGrado (Patent Docs) US: FDA completes implementation of Affordable Care Act sec. 10609 “generic… [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:56 am
There's the new Supreme Court case, Kentucky v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:07 am by sally
MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH v Merckle GmbH (Case C-316/09); [2011] WLR (D) 159 “The dissemination on a website by a pharmaceutical undertaking of information relating to medicinal products available on medical prescription only, which consisted in the reproduction of the packaging, and in the literal and complete reproduction of the package leaflet or summary of the product’s characteristics, was not contrary to article 88(1)(a) of Parliament and Council Directive… [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:33 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) This morning the Supreme Court handed down Kentucky v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
   Mrs Justice Sharp gave judgment in the “footballer privacy case” of MJN v News Group Newspapers  ([2011] EWHC 1192 (QB)). [read post]