Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 3061 - 3080
of 15,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
Shaver v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 7:41 am
The Court provides some additional guidance in its published opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 12:08 pm
In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:45 pm
State v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am
Hacking into systems is the purview of the CFAA and state anti-hacking statutes. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 8:54 am
In Cooper’s Hawk Indianapolis, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 7:37 am
C. [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Accepting Nassau's construction of the Ordinance would render the provisions concerning an employee's "initial employment date" superfluous and, citing Universal Metal & Ore, Inc. v Westchester County Solid Waste Commission, 145 AD3d 46, said "[C]ourts must give effect to the wording of a statute without rejecting any words as superfluous, and must harmonize related provisions in a way that renders them compatible;"c. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:52 am
The petition of the day is: Title: Stern v. [read post]
Eleventh Circuit rejects arguments for a right to counsel at crack sentence modification proceedings
13 Apr 2009, 10:05 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:15 am
Div. 2010), the court found that a mother who struck her child several times on the shoulder, causing visible bruises after the child refused to complete her homework and to remain in her room during a “time out” punishment, did not inflict excessive corporal punishment within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.21(c)(4)(b). [read post]
20 May 2014, 8:20 am
Marsh v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
A: this is part of the challenge—innovation folks usually don’t have to think about public law and state v. federal. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 3:16 pm
Not so much).United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 3:54 pm
” Alabama Assn. of Realtors v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am
That's the part of the Bankruptcy Code that makes your phone stop ringing and lawsuits stop coming when you file a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy in Arizona.It's a pretty complicated piece of legislation, and it's fundamentally different from the versions of stays which existed under the Bankruptcy Act (the version of the bankruptcy law that we had in the United States prior to what bankruptcy lawyers called the New Code prior to the 2005… [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 6:06 am
P. 11(b). [read post]
