Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 7,092
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
In the United States, however, the Alaska high court decision became an anomaly, not a trendsetter. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:15 am
The most recent state supreme court case on the matter, decided in 2011, is Reliable Fire Equipment Co. v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm
“When somebody’s the president of the United States, the authority is total,” Trump said. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
Castelli v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 4:46 am
In KSR v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 10:33 am
Hawk, 855 S.W.2d 573 (Tenn. 1993) and the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Troxel v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:39 pm
Many readers will be aware that the United States has no generalized protection for moral rights in its copyright law – and, arguably, after the Dastar case, no strong alternative doctrine for the protection of an author’s right to attribution and the integrity of his or her work, either. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am
These are complex cases that even industry experts with a strong business and technical background have a hard time figuring out. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida dismissed the amended complaint. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:33 am
Co., 42 NY2d 884, 885, quoting 30 NY Jur, Insurance, § 1099, p 484 [emphasis added]; see Agoado Realty Corp. v United Intl. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a challenge to the constitutionality of an offense. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:25 am
Although an arbitration award may be vacated on this “extremely narrow ground” it may be vacated only where a court can conclude, "'without engaging in any extended fact-finding or legal analysis' that a law 'prohibit[s], in an absolute sense, [the] particular matters [to be] decided'" or that "the award itself violate[s] a well-defined constitutional, statutory or common law of this State" Simply stated, said the court, “we… [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm
United States Postal Service, No. 09-1964 San Francisco v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:40 pm
United States but has since repudiated. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 6:16 pm
Second, since Miller, we have seen strong pro-privacy opinions issued from the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
See Stanger v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:27 pm
See e.g., Missouri v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
This is a shamelessly wrong false equivalence.Justice Thomas also has strong feelings about minority students attending elite universities. [read post]
