Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 6,581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2014, 10:08 am
Hall v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:21 am
Replacements (Forbes Cross-Post) Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – Summer 2013 Edition Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – February 2013 Edition California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) Court: Customer Consents to Receive Texts by Providing Phone Number to Pharmacy – Pinkard v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:06 am
Although the Supreme Court issued its decision on limitations and CEQA (Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v The Superior Court), the court granted preview in another CEQA case, resetting again the number of CEQA cases pending at the court at six. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:38 am
In addition, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
(Concurring and Dissenting Op. by Mundy, J.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that, since a party lacks a privacy interest with respect to information disclosed during pre-trial discovery, the Motion to Compel a videotape deposition of a party was properly granted by the trial court and the Motion for Protective Order regarding the videotaped deposition of the party was properly denied by the trial court. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:25 am
Superior Court of California, Solano Cty., 480 U.S. 102 (1987); Glencore Grain Rotterdam B.V. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
This question was considered in the recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision of Kimball v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:41 am
The district court granted summary judgment to City. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:05 am
The court granted the defendant’s motion, pointing out that the plaintiffs “presented nothing for consideration by the Court. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
After the defendant removed the action from Alameda County Superior Court to the District Court, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the order of the District Court granting the plaintiff’s motion to remand. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm
She goes on to apply the two-prong “experience and logic” test from the 1986 Supreme Court case Press-Enterprise Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 1:15 pm
In CDC Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
The district court granted summary judgment against the EEOC on the merits. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:42 am
Additionally, she alleged conscious pain and suffering, gross negligence, and negligent infliction of emotional distress in Essex Superior Court. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 6:17 am
Thus, the court found that plaintiffs had satisfied predominance and superiority under Rule 23(b)(3) and granted plaintiff’s motion for class certification with respect to all states but West Virginia. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:51 am
Breaking: This morning, Judge Pauley of the Southern District of New York issued an opinion granting in part and denying in part (but mostly denying) the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law in Capitol Records v MP3Tunes, in which the jury had found liability for copyright infringement and awarded over $48 million in damages. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:51 am
Breaking: This morning, Judge Paule of the Southern District of New York issued an opinion granting in part and denying in part the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law in Capitol Records v MP3Tunes, in which the jury had found liability for copyright infringement and awarded over $48 million in damages. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 10:38 am
The Ontario Superior Court Ms. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:56 am
The plaintiffs appealed from the defendant's ruling to the Superior Court, which dismissed the appeal. [read post]
