Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm
(Finally) AA v London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 (QB) This High Court judgment is remarkable in many ways, most of them worrying. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 9:44 am
Schmidt v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S was decided on 18 September, but this Kat -- who has been beset by a succession of happy distractions -- has only just got round to writing it up for the weblog. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
In Weber v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
4) ISPs should bear implementation costs ... and may think of preventative filtering as a cheaper solutionSimilarly to what stated in his earlier judgment in 20C Fox v BT (No 2), Arnold J took the view that "the rightholders should pay the costs of an unopposed application ... [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 10:46 am
In State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 2:08 pm
¶34 (quoting Villa v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 12:56 pm
In Bosch v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 7:44 am
¶11 (quoting Crook v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:20 am
Sept. 16, 2014).2Id. at ¶;¶ 3, 15, 38, 49, 51, 58-83, 117.3Id. at ¶;¶ 9, 132, 173, 181.4Id. at ¶;¶ 25-26; see also Corinthian Colleges, Inc. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
¶ 9); see also Riley v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 12:52 am
Cranford Community College v Cranford College Ltd [2014] EWHC 2999 (IPEC), decided by Judge Richard Hacon on 19 September, is another in the line of swift, simple decisions of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, which demonstrate the virtues of that humble tribunal.Cranford Community College (originally Cranford Community School) had since 1975 been a state secondary school. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:01 pm
Specifically, the DWP argued that the FTT (a) They had applied the wrong test for justification (b) They had not followed the decision of the Court of Appeal in R(MA and Others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] PTSR 584. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:16 pm
[Emphasis added.]As stated more recently in Hryniak v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm
Laing J cites Lord Sumption’s definition of harassment in 2013: “Harassment is a persistent and deliberate course of unreasonable and oppressive conduct, targeted at another person, which is calculated to and does cause that person alarm, fear or distress: see Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2002] EMLR 78 , para 30 (Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR). [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:21 pm
Sept. 10, 2014), the Federal Circuit invalidated a patent claim as being indefinite under a new standard set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Biosig v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 10:38 am
JONES V TSIGE The Facts The plaintiff, Ms. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 9:28 am
§112, ¶2. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:22 pm
"' Order ¶18 & n.4 (quoting Smithfield Business Park, LLC v. [read post]
