Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm
Canada International Extradition Treaty with the United States December 3, 1971, Date-Signed March 22, 1976, Date-In-Force STATUS: Treaty signed at Washington on December 3, 1971. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
” Ferebee v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm
YYG v PJK¸(11 March 2011), Sharp J. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:28 am
It points out that “You would need to have fairly sharp eyes to spot the apology which appeared in print and online under the heading ‘Gordon Brown’”. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 382 (08 April 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2011] EWHC 876 (QB) (08 April 2011) The Legal Services Commission v F & Ors [2011] EWHC 899 (QB) (08 April 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Moria & Anor v Bednash [2011] EWHC 839 (Ch) (08 April 2011) Batt v Royal Mail [2011] EWHC 900 (Ch) (08… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 1:43 am
In my article "Divided by a common language: US and UK patent law" which was published in Science, People & Politics (April to June 2011) I noted that one of the differences between US and UK patent law was that 35 USC 102 (b) of the US act permits an application for a US patent even where the invention has been described in a publication or application for a foreign patent that has been made in [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:07 am
The IPKat has had his attention directed to the decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd, [2011] EWCA Civ 382, a ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sir Andrew Morrit, The Chancellor of the High Court, providing a judgment with which Richards and Patten LJJ agreed) handed down yesterday.To summarise: Teva had applied for revocation of Merck’s European Patent (EP(UK) 0509752), relating to “ophthalmic compositions comprising combinations of… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:01 pm
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:06 am
Wachovia Corp. et al., case number 1:09-cv-04473; FC Holdings AB et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:02 pm
First, on 29 March 2011, there was Cook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] EWHC 763 (QB). [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) Tugendhat J referred to the judgment of the House of Lords in Sim v Stretch ([1936] 2 All ER 1237) and to the judgment of Sharp J in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd ([2009] EWHC 2779 (QB)) and held that, “whatever definition of ‘defamatory’ is adopted, it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims” [89]. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 3:46 pm
Ameritech Services, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
Roger John v IC EA/2010/0205. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:31 am
Sharp et al. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:31 am
Sharp et al. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:20 pm
Any sympathy he might have for the luxury automaker didn’t prevent him from voting against BMW in the landmark case of BMW v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Sharp J refused to stay a libel claim as a Jameel abuse. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:40 am
Watson v. [read post]
