Search for: "State v. Greening" Results 3101 - 3120 of 6,661
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm by Schachtman
His article raises some interesting points, some mistaken, but some valuable and thoughtful considerations about how to improve the state of statistical expert witness testimony. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm by Schachtman
His article raises some interesting points, some mistaken, but some valuable and thoughtful considerations about how to improve the state of statistical expert witness testimony. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 11:28 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The high PBE counties are generally above the state average on Green vote and mostly well above. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:38 pm
  Yet the Ninth Circuit somehow gave the plaintiff a green light.How can this be? [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Alternative Green Technologies, Inc., Mitchell Segal, Belmont Partners, LLC, Joseph Meuse, Howard Borg, David Ryan, Vikram Khanna, and Panascope Capital Inc.Case Number: 11-cv-09056 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case Filed: December 12, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: December 15, 2014 1/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-6 SEC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:14 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The recruiting agencies also promised the workers green cards so that they could remain in the United States permanently. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 2:51 pm by Adam Solander and Daniel J. Green
In the wake of the massive attacks against Sony, its employees have filed a putative class action Michael Corona and Christina Mathis v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:17 pm by @travelblawg
Code § 39A “Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft” in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:32 pm by Kyle Green
After the October 6, 2014 argument in front of the United States Supreme Court, attorneys for Nicholas Heien and the attorneys for the state of North Carolina finally received a decision on December 15, 2014 for the Heien v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
“The state of mind of the accused infringer is notrelevant to this objective inquiry. [read post]