Search for: "Does 1-37" Results 3121 - 3140 of 5,286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The two primary underpinnings of the BJR are:   1. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
(1) Adoption of comment k across the board in strict liability does not preclude a negligence cause of action concerning the “design” of a prescription drug. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:43 pm
  Fact is, while the Colorado law says you can smoke marijuana, it does not say you can have as much as you want. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:50 pm by Jeff Gittins
Pitcher will introduce House Bill 37 (HB 37) during the 2014 legislative session. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 1:07 am by INFORRM
In particular, it stated that one man had claimed over £1 million in benefits when he had claimed £38,852. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:59 am by Robert Kreisman
 This settlement does not include another set of cases alleging that Fosamax causes femur fractures. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2005), we held that the examiner could request further information from the applicant, and 37 C.F.R. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 10:59 am by Guest Blogger
I included a 1959 article from the Canadian Bar Review by Professor Graham Murray of the Faculty of Law at Dalhousie University, entitled, “Evidence: A Fresh Approach The American Uniform Rules Of Evidence” (1959), 37 Can. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Added by 130th General Assembly File No. 37, HB 138, §1, eff. 10/11/2013.This blog is presented by Steve Richman, Esq. and Connie Carr, Esq. of Kohrman Jackson & Krantz P.L.L. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
The essential inquiry under the first factor can be separated into two parts: whether the new work is transformative and the extent to which the use serves a commercial purpose.[1] The Google Books project had two aspects (1) digitizing copies of books for the purpose of making them available to the supplying libraries for their purposes, and (2) digitizing copies for indexing, creating a database, and providing snippets to the public in response to search queries. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 10:56 pm
   Legal Reasoning (Newman, Clevenger, Taranto)[A] Dismissal of the '605 Patent based on Narrowing AmendmentClaim 1 (with amendment)1. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 2:39 pm by Giles Peaker
  That period of 21 days is also the time limit within which the recipient of an improvement notice may appeal to the RPT against the notice under Part 3 of Schedule 1 to the Act (Schedule 1, paragraphs 10(1) and 14(1)). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 2:39 pm by Giles Peaker
  That period of 21 days is also the time limit within which the recipient of an improvement notice may appeal to the RPT against the notice under Part 3 of Schedule 1 to the Act (Schedule 1, paragraphs 10(1) and 14(1)). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:00 am by K.O. Herston
We must conclude that the fact that Mother at some point in the past engaged in once-per-week marijuana use and had a single positive drug test in September 2011, without more, does not amount to clear and convincing evidence that Mother is “unfit to properly care for [Son]” or that Son is dependent and neglected under any subsection in Section 37-1-102(b)(12). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 2:08 am
(5) If repeated and systematic re-utilisation is a requirement, (a) what does “systematic” mean? [read post]