Search for: "Strong v. United States" Results 3121 - 3140 of 7,092
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
On 8 March 2019, interim judgment was handed down in the apparently unremarkable case of Justyna Zeromska-Smith v United Lincolnshire Hospital Trust [2019] EWHC 552(QB). [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:47 am by Andrew Kent
And third, as Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner have pointed out, the Supreme Court did not apply a clear statement in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 7:53 am by Rob Robinson
TransPerfect President and CEO Phil Shawe stated, “We have competed against Semantix in the Nordics for more than 15 years and have admired their leadership position and strong reputation. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Generally, absent certain circumstances not present here, there is a strong public policy against recoupment of support overpayments. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 9:02 pm by Dan Flynn
The appellate judges came down on Idaho’s side when a section which criminalizes obtaining records of an agricultural production facility by misrepresentation—protected against a legally cognizable harm associated with a false statement survived constitutional scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 10:21 am
American federal courts-be they in California or any other state-have a strong interest in adjudicating and redressing international human rights abuses. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:51 am by Howard M. Wasserman
The federal government’s arguments Assistant to the Solicitor General Michael Huston argued for the United States in support of Egbert. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:34 am by Christopher Walker
United States fame, returns to the court as a law-professor amicus. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 8:58 am by admin
  Ever since the 1936 Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
United States X, formerly known as Twitter, has filed a federal defamat [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
These votes seem much more aligned with the Republican Party’s desire to make it harder for people of color to vote than any reasonable interpretation of the United States Constitution.There is an aspect of equal protection clause doctrine that prohibits states from conditioning the exercise of fundamental rights on payments that the poor cannot afford. [read post]