Search for: "Clarke v. State"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 3,543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2014, 11:47 am
The court concluded that defendant had never establish that the learned treatise was a “reliable authority” as required under Wilson vs Clark. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
This question had been unsettled earlier, see, e.g., Clark v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor) New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist) United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat) United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and justifying attorney… [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:05 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Similarly, in Karnail Singh and others v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
§ 371, which prohibits conspiracies to defraud the United States in the administration of elections. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 2:25 pm
United States (2019). [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 5:28 pm
As Montana v. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 2:43 pm
I despise Cooper v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:30 am
Clarke entitled “Ten Years Later. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
": Kathleen Clark, Washington U. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:34 am
Clark is home to the famous Mashed Potato Wrestling contest. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
United States The Gu [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:44 am
The case pitted the American Public Health Association v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:40 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 9:43 am
In its detailed elaboration of constitutional avoidance in Clark v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s recent landmark decision in Medellín v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 10:49 pm
In essence, the courts will likely have to decide whether students should now be considered as the consumers of a service, moving the issue into the sphere of private law (and revisiting the case of Clark v University of Lincolnshire and Humberside). [read post]
