Search for: "Reach v. State"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 37,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2016, 4:00 am
An 18-year delay by the State Division of Human Rights in issuing its determination characterized as being “jurisprudentially intolerable”Matter of New York State Dept. of Correction and Community Supervision v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 137 AD3d 1512, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn August 1995 Kenneth W. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 8:25 am
As our personal injury lawyers know, this arbitrary cap was front-and-center in a North Broward Hospital District v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:40 am
The effort reached its apogee this year in State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 12:21 pm
This posting was written by Jeffrey May, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.Intel Corporation announced yesterday that it had reached an agreement with the New York State Attorney General to terminate an antitrust lawsuit filed by the state in November 2009. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 4:30 am
Manson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:06 am
Look no further than Price v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:14 pm
It noted that the Eighth Circuit had reached a different conclusion on this question. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 9:57 am
The decision in Mayo v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 2:32 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:59 am
Schutte v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 4:34 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 10:04 pm
United States v. 39 Cases, 192 F. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 12:46 pm
Case Citation: Mayhall v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:53 am
Bank v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
Va. 1985); andthe Lundberg test recently adopted by the Kansas Court of Appeals, which unifies these two approaches (State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
But query whether in the federalism context, where other plain-statement rules such as that announced in 1991 in Gregory v Ashcroft (which requires Congress to clearly say in the text of a regulatory statute that the statute applies to state and local government entities before states can be required to obey) seem designed to make sure Congress has carefully considered state interests, Congress itself has to be the one to fix any vagueness problems in the terms of… [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:55 pm
NRA v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 11:32 am
See State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 9:38 pm
You can reach Mr. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 7:05 am
Even where there is no legislative requirement to give reasons, principles of procedural fairness may require that a written explanation be provided for the decision reached (see Baker v. [read post]
