Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 4,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2011, 5:44 am
State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
Tompkins and Miranda v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am
Might work better if claims were confined to copyright v. patent w/r/t software? [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:03 am
Tompkins and Miranda v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:18 pm
Over the years, detectives have executed various warrants for hair, saliva and blood samples. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:44 am
The litigation, captioned Bearder et al v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:39 am
Please address application packets to: Matthew Maddox Program Coordinator United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia Albert V. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:50 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:13 pm
Allen v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:08 am
Aviva Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:05 am
The lawsuit, entitled Pippins, et al. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:48 pm
Div. 1993), even if the test constitutes only a “minimal intrusion,” State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:08 pm
Here's the abstract: In May 2009, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:33 am
Bennett (echoing the pre-CU decision in FEC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:30 am
See, e.g., Rogers v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:00 am
. §2031.230 (pdf) which states in part: A representation of inability to comply with the particular demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling shall affirm that a diligent search and a reasonable inquiry has been made in an effort to comply with that demand . . . [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:00 am
§2031.230 (pdf) which states in part: A representation of inability to comply with the particular demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling shall affirm that a diligent search and a reasonable inquiry has been made in an effort to comply with that demand . . . [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:53 am
Healy v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm
” Instead, the State called Razatos, another lab worker, who had not observed Caylor’s testing of Bullcoming’s sample but who could talk about lab procedures in general and the meaning and reliability of the report. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm
Apple retains the right to withdraw from the settlement in the event an excessive number of requests for exclusion are received.The Court will hold a hearing in this case (Johnson v. [read post]
