Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 29,658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 9:19 pm
Windsor, striking down a federal law denying benefits to married same-sex couples.* Exactly 12 years ago to the day, Justice Kennedy's decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
On the merits, the Chief Justice’s emphasis, in King v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:58 pm
On motion for judg- ment as a matter of law, the district court discussed the evidence and concluded that the jury findings were sup- ported by substantial evidence, that obviousness had not been proved by clear and convincing evidence, and that the jury verdict was not a miscarriage of justice. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court’s Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 11:59 am
State of Indiana, a 4-page, 5-0 opinion, Justice Boehm concludes:For the reasons explained in Gutermuth v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 4:44 am
Error 404A long-awaited case on intermediary liability and copyright infringement has finally been decided by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:32 am
A day earlier in Europe, President Obama had more pointed remarks for the Supreme Court and its acceptance of the King v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:20 am
International Court of Justice (ICJ) Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
The point was captured well by Justice Blackmun in his opinion for the Court in Freytag: "In reaching this conclusion, we note that we are not persuaded by the Commissioner's request that this Court defer to the Executive Branch's decision that there has been no legislative encroachment on Presidential prerogatives . . . . [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:45 am
So what is Case C-495/07 Silberquelle GmbH v Maselli-Strickmode GmbH all about? [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in Vieth v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 1:44 pm
The case is Desbiens v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:39 pm
Acknowledging the benefits often realized through ADR, as well as the overarching goal of justice systems to facilitate justice, she concludes that: “ADR is here to stay, and that is a good thing. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 7:50 am
The case, Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:03 am
Building on the state high court's recent decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:19 am
Supreme Court's decision today in Ashcroft v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:56 am
The case of McDaniel v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:16 pm
The forceful and well-reasoned concurring opinion by Justice Hyman explains why efforts to expose the names of alleged victims of sexual misconduct or assault is a pernicious practice. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:20 am
On the Supreme Court, Justice Gorsuch has been the most open skeptic, wondering whether “International Shoe just doesn’t work quite as well as it once did,” though Justice Thomas and Justice Alito have shared similar concerns. [read post]
