Search for: "State v. Bias"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 5,336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2021, 6:11 pm
Under the United States Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:24 pm
Tex. 1969); United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
It can also be because someone knows something isn't true but wants to believe it is; that's also on a spectrum: unconscious bias on one end, conscious bias on the other. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:22 am
Colorado State Board of Agriculture, 2007 WL 2022061, *18 (D. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
Citing evidence that a 62-year old Tyson Foods employee—who was terminated for attendance issues after she arrived less than two minutes late for work—was treated more harshly than a younger employee, that Tyson may have violated its own policy with regard to her alleged attendance issues, and that the decisionmaker had a practice of removing older employees from his department, a federal district court in Iowa denied summary judgment against her federal and state age… [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:26 am
Although a technician at a particular location far from state lines, like here, may “rarely” drive across state lines, this only meant that the regulation would “rarely” be violated. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 9:09 am
The plan noted the employee’s behavior during the state survey as the cause. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
United States and Warger v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
In the Chrysler bankruptcy case (Indiana State Police Pension Trust, et al., v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:10 pm
But, in fact, the oral argument Monday in Rivera v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 11:26 am
Matthew Tokson analyzed federal and state judgments applying Carpenter v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 11:00 am
” But, years after the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm
Cornell Law School Dean and prominent property law scholar Eduardo Peñalver’s has posted a thoughtful review of my book The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:13 am
The state has no compelling interest in censoring speech it finds “repugnant,” the court wrote, and the First Amendment does not allow remedying unwanted speech with enforced silence (Honeyfund.com, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 7:43 am
Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) arbitral tribunal will release its long-awaited award in Philippines v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 5:08 am
From Zeleny v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:54 pm
The new case — Staub v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
Using the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart v Dukes as its guide, the court also held the plaintiffs lacked commonality. [read post]
