Search for: "*u.s. v. Casey" Results 301 - 320 of 726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2019, 5:41 pm by Josh Blackman
Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 352 n.2 (1996), NFIB offers no inferences of value for the majority to draw. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 6:28 am by Nicole Huberfeld
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 12:22 pm by Amy Howe
The district judge’s decision is no longer in effect because the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:06 pm
Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 844, 112 S.Ct. 2791, 120 L.Ed.2d 674 (1992), “Liberty finds no refuge in a jurisprudence of doubt. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 11:10 am by Kyle Hawkins
Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:27 am by JB
See Loving 388 U.S., at 12; Lawrence,539 U.S., at 566–567.Another way of putting this is the the debate between Justice Brennan and Justice Scalia in Michael H. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, Gorsuch's conception of plurality opinions severely undercuts the precedential value of Casey. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 12:34 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, holding that the Constitution protects the right to have an abortion before the fetus can survive outside the womb. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Looking back on Roe, Justice Scalia pointed out in his (blistering) dissent in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey, 505 U.S. 833, (1992), that it was a cause of the deep division in our politics: Not only did Roe not, as the Court suggests, resolve the deeply divisive issue of abortion; it did more than anything to nourish it, by elevating it to the national level where it is infinitely more difficult to resolve. [read post]